The Milwaukee 2620-22ย Sawzall is just plain fun to use. Itโs cordless, which opens up a wide range of opportunities for use, and weighs justย shy of 8 lbs with the battery. The weight puts it surprisingly close to its cordedย brethren. What it gives up in power (and lack of orbital action) itย makes up in strokes per minute. In fact, it has more SPM than theย corded 11-15 amp models Milwaukee offers. Since it lacked orbitalย action (which reduces its effectiveness at demolition work) overall cutting progress was considerably slowerย than a corded or even cordless orbital model. Itโs a trade-off โ slowerย cutting vs. extended battery life. It honestly seems like it could goย either way, and we probably would have preferred an orbital option. ย Another thing that impressed us was the generous stroke depth โ aย full 1โณย โ which was just 1/4-inch shorter than the typical corded Sawzallย Reciprocating Saws, but a little less than much of the cordless competition.
Milwaukee 2620-22 Reciprocating Saw Build Quality
If you havenโt yet figured this out, Milwaukee made this cordlessย model to get as close as possible to the same power as its corded offerings. Thatโs a tallย order, so it was with great anticipation that we hit the test bench andย lined up some wood and other materials to cut. We started with aย standard 2ร4. The M18 Sawzall took to it with gusto and sliced offย piece after piece. With this tool, the blade is going to make all theย difference. We preferred the rougher, demo blades when cutting throughย 2ร4 studs for demo work, but a finer general-purpose bladeย (included with the saw) was better suited for handling PVC and even slicingย through 1/4โณ plywood sheathing. The Milwaukeeย 2620-22 reciprocating saw evenย made mincemeat out of some old growth pine and allowed us to hack our way through some finish nails that had beenย nestled in a trim board we were slicing through. We recommend the first thing you do is buy a handful of blades,ย including one for metal, and this saw will work wonders for mostย applications.
We liked the variable speed trigger โ if only because it allowed us to ease into our work. The lack of an adjustable depth shoe, however, meant that our blade use was less efficient and specific depth settings were out of the question. Blade changes were quick and easy and it took just a flip of the lever to have our old blade out and the new one in.
Noise output was more than acceptable with the Milwaukeeย 2620-22 reciprocating saw, and we onlyย measured 89 dB at our traditional distance of 3 feet (be prepared for this to increase when you cut into building materials). Those looking to do a ton of demoย work will still want to stick to a corded orbital model simply becauseย it offers a bit more stroke and power for extensive jobs where youย donโt want to be interrupted.
Conclusion
The Milwaukee 2620-22 Sawzall Reciprocating Saw Kit is a tool that performed very well with consistent results. Because it lacks some of the features weโd expect in a flagship cordless reciprocating saw, like orbital action and an adjustable shoe, this particular tool fails to truly stand out among its peers. For our Value rating, we gave the M18 SawZall a 5/10 because the competition really gives it a run for the money. Performance was a different story altogether. Although your results will vary based on the blade selection you use, the M18 Sawzall really took to its work, and we ranked it an 8/10 to reflect its aggressive cutting ability. For $350, this isnโt a tool for the average homeowner, but construction professionals should feel they are adding a substantial tool to their arsenal. For those who are doing a lot of demo work, you may want to stick to a corded model or take a look at some of the competitive cordless products on the market.
